Editorial Policy

Editorial Governance

IAS Courses editorial processes are overseen by a team with expertise in HIV clinical care, public health program management, and medical education. Editorial decisions prioritize scientific accuracy, evidence quality, and educational effectiveness.

Content Development Process

Course development begins with systematic literature review and consultation with subject matter experts. Draft content undergoes technical review for scientific accuracy, editorial review for clarity and accessibility, and pilot testing with representative learners when feasible. Content is refined based on reviewer feedback before publication.

Evidence Standards

Content is based on peer-reviewed literature, WHO technical guidance, and implementation science research. Evidence quality is assessed using established frameworks. Recommendations reflect the strength and quality of underlying evidence. Areas of evidence uncertainty or ongoing debate are explicitly acknowledged.

Language and Terminology

IAS Courses uses person-first language and terminology aligned with international standards for HIV communication. We avoid stigmatizing language and prioritize respectful terminology that reflects current understanding of HIV as a manageable chronic condition.

Content Updates

Educational content is reviewed periodically and updated when new evidence emerges that materially affects recommendations or understanding. Major guideline revisions trigger content review. Update dates are indicated on course pages.

Correction Policy

Errors identified in published content are corrected promptly. Significant corrections are documented with update dates. Users may report potential errors through our contact page.

External Contributors

External subject matter experts may contribute to content development or review. All contributors disclose potential conflicts of interest. Contributors do not have final editorial authority; decisions rest with IAS Courses editorial team.

Last updated: January 2026